Smartwatches are still not we would like them to be in terms of functionality but when they first started popping up a few years back, not only weren’t they very functional, they were really ugly. As time went on things have improved and companies that make smartwatches have been able to much better mesh looks and function together.

Fossil has always made real good looking yet affordable watches and when they jumped into making smartwatches much of that did remain the same. The first and only Fossil smartwatch that I ever used was the Q-Founder and it was a well made, well designed smartwatch. It didn’t look like a smartwatch and that was cool but the Q-Founder wasn’t without its issues. It was kind of heavy, the display was a little on the big side, battery life wasn’t very good and Android Wear at that time was just okay.

Fossil’s newest edition to the Q series is the Q-Explorist in its 3rd iteration. It’s a well-built, lightweight, functional smartwatch running Android 2.0. All good things. Unfortunately, that’s all the Q-Explorist really has to offer. There isn’t anything revolutionary about the Q-Explorist. It’s just nuanced.

I want to be clear in saying that the Q-Explorist isn’t a bad smartwatch. It’s a very good smartwatch but it suffers from everything that all smartwatches suffer from in my opinion. Not having an identity. Smartwatches today are nothing more than extensions of your cell phone and what you’re really paying for is which one looks better at doing it. The Fossil Q-Explorist along with a lot of other smartwatches that fall right into this category.

It is gorgeous. I can’t lie about that. I wear it everyday. I love it. It’s so clean and it’s my ideal choice for what type of watch I would normally wear. The fact that’s its “smart” enhances it and for what it’s worth, the watch does do that quite a bit. I have the 44mm version of the Q-Explorist but there is a 42mm version as well.

Spec wise the Q-Explorist touches all the bases. It’s got a high-resolution AMOLED display, swappable bands, wireless magnetic charging, Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor and 4GB of memory. This alongside Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity.There is integration with top fitness apps including Google Fit, UA Record by Under Armour, Strava, and RunKeeper. The screen on the Q-Explorist is fully round with 100% of the screen being used for function. Standalone apps can be installed directly to the watch or from your phone to the watch. Big improvements were also made in having Google Assistant as opposed to Google Now and everything comes together cohesively and Android 2.0 is looking like a solid OS.

The experience was smooth and the watch never stumbled or froze. I didn’t really have much issue except for the speakers not being too great but that wasn’t a deal breaker because after all, it’s a smartwatch. The crown on the Q-Explorist was probably the biggest annoyance in that I always found myself pushing it in whenever I raised my wrist a certain way. Battery life could have been better. I averaged about a day, and until the morning before I had to charge it but that was only good if I wasn’t going anywhere the next day. So, basically you have to charge the watch everyday, even at the lowest energy settings. NFC, GPS not being available isn’t a big deal for me. I can’t however understand why the heart monitor was omitted but there’s Google Fit integration on the watch. Mind boggling but also, not a deal breaker.

Final thought

My final thought about the Q-Explorist is that it’s a really good smartwatch. I would absolutely recommend it for anyone looking for a smartwatch that isn’t an Apple Watch (No knock on the Apple Watch). Android 2.0 has vastly improved and provides a smoother experience. It’s competitively priced at $255 and $275 and there are additional bands if you want them vary that between $25 and up to $40 on Fossil’s website. You won’t be breaking the bank on the Q-Explorist and it’s a smartwatch which actually looks like a watch. The drawback to the Q-Explorist isn’t in anything Fossil did or didn’t do. They actually nailed it with this watch but again, smartwatches really don’t do much and Android 2.0 on this watch is a big improvement but nothing different. I wouldn’t be mad at anyone who picked one up however. You can head over to Fossil’s website and order yours and a couple of bands HERE or pick one up at your favorite retailer.

SHARE
Previous articleAre Android Phones Better than Apple’s devices
Next articleGoogle Home Mini vs. Amazon Echo Dot : Sound Off!

Mike Bitter is a born gadget head and true lover of technology. It all started with computer classes at age 10 and his first PC the Tandy 1000. From then on he found his love and he became a gamer and a PC builder and has not stopped since. He specializes in hardware, troubleshooting and custom PC building. He’s known as the “fixer” amongst his friends whenever there is a problem with a PC or a Mac. He’s also fully immersed in all things that pertain to the world of computers and gaming. He’s an 80’s baby and he grew up watching technology evolve from the NES to PS4 and from the Commodore 64 to the iMac. He has a unique and minimalist perspective on technology and is here to help the average person to understand technology today.

  • I’ve seen several reviews where people complain about hitting the button when flexing their wrist. Either my arm is built strange or I just wear my watch differently as I never have had that issue. It rides just behind my wrist bone which seems to keep it out of the way.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f99951e7b2ddc9dd163e870ca8e35c5167d9c1d8f3f2116af4956cafdd0bd600.jpg

    Beyond that, I love the watch. I had an original Moto 360, which unfortunately suffered a battery failure at just under two years of age. That watch looked like a piece of tech, this one looks like a watch. With the stainless steel band you really know you have it on.